The seas are inexorably rising, and the Florida Legislature is tackling this by creating a Resilient Florida Grant Program in the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The bill creating the program, Senate Bill 1954, passed unanimously in both the House and the Senate. Gov. Ron DeSantis should sign it.
At stake for South Florida are millions of dollars for sea walls, storm hardening and other infrastructure projects that will better prepare us to tackle a future in which we endure increased flooding, stronger storms and higher seas.
Colin Polsky, director of Florida Atlantic University’s Center for Environmental Studies, said “on the face of it, this legislation appears to position Florida at the forefront of U.S. states institutionalizing serious adaptation actions. … So if this bill lives up to its billing, then the blurring of blue versus red on climate in Florida will have taken a quantum leap forward.”
On April 12, the White House released state-by-state numbers as part of its American Jobs Plan that highlighted bridges and roads in each state in poor condition, the percentages of households without access to broadband, the number of extreme weather events and other metrics.
Florida experienced 22 extreme weather events from 2010-2020 at a cost of $100 billion. Only Texas, California and Hawaii were hit with larger bills due to extreme weather, and in the cases of Texas and Hawaii, the number of events — 67 and 145, respectively — dwarfed Florida’s.
Extreme weather, like sea level rise, will only become a bigger threat as climate change takes its toll on the planet. The Biden administration has set aside $50 billion specifically for resilient infrastructure. This time around, it’s Republicans who won’t like the funding source, as the administration intends to raise corporate tax rates from 21% to 28%, which would still be below the highest corporate tax rates prior to the 2017 Trump tax cut.
For years, Republicans have maintained that sharp cuts in federal income and corporate taxes would pay for themselves, as more money remained in the hands of consumers and businesses. This has not happened. Worse, this wrongheaded dogma has caused the past two Republican presidential administrations to borrow vast amounts in order to enact massive tax cuts, sending the federal government into the sort of sky-high deficits that the party claims to loathe when it derides “tax and spend” liberals.
To that, we say, at least the liberals have the right order of things. Tax, then spend. Cutting taxes and then spending just as much has never made much sense.
Just as Democrats in the Florida Legislature can approve of a Republican plan to create a resiliency infrastructure program centered around block grants while disapproving the funding source, so too should Republicans in Washington be able to support the Biden administration’s American Jobs Plan while taking a dim view of tax increases, as the party always has.
What everyone should agree on — what they should all be able to work together on, as the Florida Legislature did in unanimously passing SB 1954 — is that this spending is needed, now. A 2020 report by the Urban Land Institute found that for every dollar spent now on adapting to the effects of climate change in South Florida, the region would save two dollars in the long run. In other words, it costs a lot more to repair than it does to prepare.
— The Sun Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
