Kansas Republican conservatives lump everything with CRT

Be it racy books or LGBTQ rights, conservatives lump them under the currently contentious Critical Race Theory.

By

Editorials

December 6, 2021 - 8:56 AM

Kansas State Board of Education member Ann Mah appears Wednesday before an education committee at the Statehouse, where she denounced the use of critical race theory to describe a broad range of complaints. Photo by (Screen capture from Legislature live video)

Let’s set the record straight about what critical race theory is.

Critical race theory, sometimes referred to as CRT, is defined as probing how racism has become embedded in societal and cultural structures.

The theory is most commonly taught at the university level in graduate courses.

The Topeka Capital-Journal’s Andrew Bahl reported the Kansas State Department of Education has denied CRT’s presence in statewide curriculum or standards. Nevertheless Kansas Legislature’s Special Committee on Education launched a probe into CRT and held a hearing Wednesday.

“I think we are a little bit tired of that academic definition,” said Rep. Kristey Williams, R-Augusta, who chairs the Special Committee on Education. “It does not mean that CRT application is not being used (in schools).”

In disregarding the definition Rep. Williams might be missing the point. Perhaps she should have paid more attention in school?

Bahl reports Republican legislators and a parade of parents pointed to a series of examples that do not meet the academic definition of critical race theory but which they found objectionable nonetheless.

Examples include training and curriculum framework in USD 512 Shawnee Mission and Wichita USD 259, the contents of school libraries some of which include books which depict sex scenes, profanity or other topics deemed problematic, and other diversity initiatives.

“Learning about racism is not CRT and I think our students are smart enough to be able to handle those tough topics,” state board of education Member Ann Mah told the committee. “I think we should work together to end CRT disputes and start using the real terms we are using in schools.”

Mah has a point. Equating all diversity initiatives to CRT is imprecise. It’s also not helpful. Especially when CRT is not being taught in our K-12 schools. Why is the Legislature spending time on this?

Some of the things discussed in this hearing had nothing to do with racial issues or CRT. Frankly, we’re having a hard time understanding what these lawmakers and parents are actually upset about.

From where we stand lawmakers could better spend their time and resources making sure Kansas students can earn a quality education.

Let’s make sure schools in rural communities have access to high speed internet. Let’s get quality teachers in classrooms. Let’s ensure that a Kansan will get a solid education no matter if they reside in Sheridan County or Shawnee County and everywhere across the state.

Related