Historians will not look back on 2023 as a happy year for humanity. Wars blazed, autocratic regimes swaggered and in many countries strongmen flouted laws and curbed liberty.
This is the grim backdrop to our annual “country of the year” award.
If our prize was for the resilience of ordinary people in the face of horror, there would be an abundance of candidates, from the Palestinians and Israelis in their bitter conflict to the Sudanese fleeing as their country implodes.
Yet since we started naming countries of the year in 2013, we have sought to recognize something different: the place that has improved the most.
The search for a bright spot in a bleak world led some of our staff to despair and propose Barbie Land, the fictional pink utopia of a Hollywood blockbuster. But in real life, there are two sets of countries that deserve recognition in 2023.
THE FIRST includes places that have stood up to bullying by autocratic neighbors.
One cannot say that life in Ukraine improved, but the country valiantly continued its struggle against Vladimir Putin’s war machine, despite wobbling by its Western supporters.
Moldova resisted Russian intimidation. Finland joined the NATO alliance and Sweden will follow soon.
In Asia a number of countries held their nerve in the face of Chinese aggression, often in collaboration with America.
The Philippines defended its maritime boundaries, and the law of the sea, against much bigger Chinese ships. In August Japan and South Korea put aside their historical grievances to deepen their co-operation.
The island state of Tuvalu, with a population of 11,000, has just signed a treaty with Australia that insures its population against climate change and includes a security guarantee to prevent it from falling under China’s thumb.
Our second group of countries defended democracy or liberal values at home.
Fragile, war-scarred Liberia managed a peaceful transfer of power. So did Timor-Leste, which maintained its reputation for respecting human rights and a free press. In some mid-sized countries, such as Thailand and Turkey, hope flickered as the opposition pushed hard to eject autocratic regimes, but those regimes held on at elections skewed in their favor.
Three countries stand out for turning back to moderation after a walk on the wild side.
Brazil swore in a center-left president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, after four years of mendacious populism under Jair Bolsonaro, who spread divisive conspiracy theories, coddled trigger-happy cops, supported rain forest-torching farmers, refused to accept electoral defeat and encouraged his devotees to attempt an insurrection.
