In 40 years of chronicling life in the Alaskan interior, Dermot Cole has seen no end of hustles and grand plans play out in America’s last frontier.
He wrote a column for decades for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, and has penned six books on the rambunctious history of the region — including an oral history of the stampede that first brought the black gold rush north, the building of the Tran-Alaska Oil Pipeline. So my ears perked up when he said he’d never seen a scheme quite like this.
“It’s like they’re holding a going out of business sale,” Cole told me from his home in Fairbanks.
What’s going out of business is the Trump administration. And what they’re trying to sell as they get pushed out the door are oil-drilling leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
TAPPING INTO the country’s largest wildlife refuge is a goal that has eluded industry and Alaskan politicians ever since the otherworldly sweep of river canyons and tundra along the Arctic Ocean was first protected back in 1960.
But the rush is sure on now. After slipping authorization for drilling into a tax cut bill a few years ago — a tactic used because it wouldn’t have passed as a standalone bill — the Trump administration now is scrambling to jam through a sale as a sort of grand finale giveaway to the extraction industries.
Cole, who says he isn’t for or against drilling in the refuge (many Alaskans support it, for the jobs), says the bumbling and the haste here at the end threatens to turn a big deal into a joke.
Example: On Nov. 17, the agency overseeing the project, the Bureau of Land Management, announced a 30-day comment period, which was supposed to be followed by another 30-day period for the agency to review the comments.
But somebody must have done some high-level math and figured out that two 30-day periods equals 60 days from Nov. 17, which, accounting for holidays and weekends, happens to be the day before Joe Biden’s inauguration.
“They couldn’t have a sale on the very last day, it looks sleazy, but also they wouldn’t even have time to review the bids,” Cole says.
So on Dec. 3 the agency abruptly announced, with the comment period only half over, that it had already made up its mind to hold a sale, on Jan. 6.
“They obviously don’t care what the comments say,” Cole said. “They effectively just admitted the process they’re running is a sham.”
Another example: Major banks have been announcing that they no longer will finance oil-drilling projects in ANWR, mostly due to climate change and concern about bad publicity. Trump said this amounted to “discrimination against these great energy companies,” so in late November he imposed a new fiscal rule to bar the banks from boycotting ANWR projects based on the environment.
“So now the oil companies, among the richest and most powerful companies in the world, are victims of discrimination?” Cole said. “It’s laughable. People are laughing at this.”
Yet the fate of ANWR remains a serious issue. Will this going out of business sale succeed?
