Survey shows most Kansans support criminal charge for police chief

The Kansas Coalition for Open Government commissioned an online survey of 305 Kansas adults from Sept. 23 to Oct. 2 to collect their opinions about the raid of the Marion County Record newspaper office, editor's home, and a city councilwoman's home.

By

State News

October 16, 2024 - 2:43 PM

Former Marion Police Chief Gideon Cody leaves court Oct. 7, 2024, in Marion after a hearing in his criminal case. Photo by Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector

TOPEKA — A new survey shows most Kansans believe former Marion Police Chief Gideon Cody should be prosecuted for raiding a newspaper office, editor’s home and a city councilwoman’s home last year.

When asked to comment, the respondents had some choice words to describe the police action.

They called the raids illegal, messy, invasive, rushed, crooked, overzealous, insane, wrong, unfair, unnecessary, unjustified and unethical.

“Honestly, this upsets me that this even happened,” one of the respondents wrote. “It was all public information so they should not have even been investigated. It would make a local newspaper not want to investigate or report on such things because they might end up being arrested for something that’s not even illegal.”

CODY LED police in the Aug. 11, 2023, raids after concluding that journalists and a city councilwoman committed crimes by obtaining a public driving record for Kari Newell, a Marion resident who operated a restaurant and had applied for a liquor license. The raids ignored federal and state laws and constitutional protections for a free press and against illegal searches and seizures.

Joan Meyer, the 98-year-old co-owner of the Marion County Record, died from cardiac arrest a day after police raided the home where she lived with her son, Eric, who is the editor and publisher of the newspaper.

Newspaper employees and the councilwoman have filed a combined five civil lawsuits in federal court in response to the raids. Special prosecutors who reviewed the situation cleared police of wrongdoing in the raids but charged Cody with obstruction of justice for asking Newell after the raid to delete text messages.

THE KANSAS Coalition for Open Government commissioned an online survey of 305 Kansas adults from Sept. 23 to Oct. 2 to collect their opinions about the raid. The survey provided background information, posed questions and asked for comments.

Emily Bradbury, a coalition member who also serves as president of the Kansas Press Association, said the survey supports the coalition’s position that the state should “prosecute those who orchestrated the raids.”

“Escaping criminal liability for the raids, despite officers so brazenly misconstruing public records as private information, is not only ineffective punishment for clear misconduct, but also a green light for officers to avoid liability for violating constitutional rights in the future merely by claiming they didn’t know any better,” Bradbury said.

Coda Ventures, based in Tennessee, conducted the survey, which has a margin of error of 5.6%. The online survey used a sample from Quest Mindshare, an Ontario, Canada, research company. Quotas were set for age, gender, education and geographic location, with the goal of providing an accurate representation of the Kansas adult population.

Of the 305 respondents, 54% were women, 32% were college graduates, 37% were married, 33% were Republicans, 22% were Democrats, and 34% were politically independent.

THE SURVEY, which found 39% were familiar with the situation, recounted facts leading up to the raids, including a journalist’s use of a Kansas Department of Revenue online database to verify a tip about Newell’s driving record.

In the survey, 67% said it was appropriate for the journalist to access the record, and 14% were unsure.

The survey told respondents that Cody investigated the situation and determined journalists and the councilwoman committed the following crimes: breach of privacy, identity theft, unlawful use of a communication facility (KDOR), official misconduct, witness intimidation, interferences with law enforcement, and performance of an unauthorized official act.

Related
October 8, 2024
April 3, 2024
December 5, 2023
October 2, 2023