Groups push Congress on labeling requirements

Congress ended mandatory labeling for pork and beef in 2015. Now some livestock groups want to see labeling requirements included in the upcoming farm bill that would make it clear where livestock was born, raised and slaughtered.

By

News

June 21, 2024 - 2:42 PM

Packaged pork in a case at a HyVee grocery store in Columbia, Mo. Some livestock groups want all beef and pork products to clearly disclose where the livestock was born, raised and processed. Photo by Skyler Rossi/Harvest Public Media

Some livestock groups are pushing for Congress to reinstate labeling requirements in the upcoming farm bill to make it clear where meat comes from.

Mandatory country of origin labels would require all meat products to include details about where the livestock was born, raised and processed.

A similar requirement went into effect in 2009, but it was reversed for beef and pork products in 2015 after a World Trade Organization ruling allowed Canada and Mexico to impose over $1 billion in tariffs against the U.S., unless the requirements were removed.

The labels would help consumers better understand what they are purchasing, said Tim Gibbons, the communication director for the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, a group that wants to see the label requirement return.

He said it could also help address concentration in the meat industry at a time when 85% of the meatpacking industry is controlled by just four beef processing companies.

“One of the main purposes of a representative democracy is to enforce antitrust laws so that markets are open, fair and competitive,” Gibbons said. “Country of origin labeling is a first step in ensuring competition in markets.”

Earlier this year, the USDA narrowed which products can state “Product of USA.” Beginning in 2026, a voluntary rule allows only meat from animals born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the U.S. to have this label.

Montana-based livestock group R-CALF USA called the voluntary rule a step in the right direction in a March press release, but also called for a mandatory rule as soon as possible.

“Only then will consumers be informed as to which beef was produced by American cattle farmers and ranchers and which beef was produced under some foreign country’s food safety regime,” CEO Bill Bullard stated.

Matt Teagarden is the CEO of the Kansas Livestock Association, a trade group with about 5,700 members.

The association supports a voluntary policy like the recent rule, Teagarden said, since it allows producers who want to market their products as “Made in USA” to do so without requiring everyone to bear the costs. Producers whose brand is focused on its locality may also turn to a “farm-to-table” concept, or market their meat as local to their state or region, he said.

“There may be greater opportunity to even push that down to a more local level and market that product and connect with consumers in that way,” he said.

A group of U.S. senators has introduced a bill coined the American Beef Labeling Act for multiple years in hopes of reinstating the mandatory labeling.

U.S. Sen. Mike Round, R-SD, said this week that he is working to add mandatory labeling to the Senate version of the farm bill. Country of origin labeling requirements are not currently in either the House or the Senate version.

The current farm bill will expire in September.

Related